Vatican City, 10 October 2014 (VIS) –
During the eighth general Congregation, held yesterday afternoon, the
general debate continued to follow the agenda of the Instrumentum
Laboris, focusing on the theme “The Church and the Family in the
Challenge of Upbringing (Part III, Chapter 2). The Challenge of
Upbringing in General / Christian Education in Difficult Family
Situations”.
Firstly, the vocation of life as a
basic element of the family was emphasised; this led to an invitation
to the faithful to deepen their knowledge of Paul VI’s Encyclical,
Humanae Vitae, thus better understanding the meaning of the use of
natural methods of fertility control and the non-acceptance of
contraception. Union and procreation, it was said, are not separate
from the conjugal act. The condemnation of genetic manipulation and
cryopreservation of embryos was therefore reiterated forcefully.
From various quarters there emerged the
tendency of several states and organisations based in the Western
world to present, especially in the context of Africa, various
concepts (including abortion and homosexual unions) as “human
rights”, linked to economic aid and strong pressure campaigns for
the promotion of such concepts. In this respect, it was highlighted
that the expression “rights to sexual and reproductive health”
does not have a precise definition in international law and ends up
encompassing mutually contradictory principles such as the
condemnation of forced abortion and the promotion of safe abortion,
or the protection of maternity and the promotion of contraception.
Also without any binding value, the promotion of such “rights”
represents a risk, as it may influence the interpretation of other
norms, especially in combating discrimination against women.
The Assembly reiterated the importance
of adequate preparation for marriage, as its celebration seems to be
increasingly reduced to the social and legal status, rather than a
religious and spiritual bond. The preparatory course, it was noted,
is often perceived by couples as an imposition, a task to complete
without conviction, and as a result it is too brief. Since marriage
is a vocation for life, preparation for it should be long and
detailed, as in the case of preparation for religious life. It was
also shown that, among couples, there is a frequent lack of awareness
of the sacramental value of the marriage bond, so much so that the
celebration of the marriage rite, it was said, is not automatically
the celebration of the marriage sacrament.
With regard to the streamlining of
procedures for the process of verifying matrimonial nullity, it was
recalled that a special study Commission for the reform of the
canonical marriage nullification process was instituted by the Holy
Father Francis on 20 September 2014, and the hope was expressed that
it will enable a simpler procedure to be put into effect, which must
however be single and uniform for all the Church. Furthermore, with
regard to the double confirming sentences consequent to mandatory
appeal, it was asked whether the possibility had been raised of
leaving the decision of recourse to appeal to the discretion of the
bishop. At the same time, the hope was expressed that there would be
a greater presence of suitably prepared lay judges, women in
particular.
The Assembly went on to insist on the
importance of good preparation for priests in relation to the
pastoral care of marriage and the family, and remarked that homilies
can be used as a special and effective moment for proclaiming the
Gospel of the family to the faithful. It was commented that there is
a need for formation and information, as the spiritual holiness of
the priest, his creativity and his direct relationship with families
are particularly appreciated by the faithful.
There were further reflections on the
relationship between migration and family, in which it was reiterated
that the family unit is a fundamental right to be accorded to every
migrant, and the importance of protection for the right to family
unity through international migratory policies was emphasised. It was
said that the family is an essential element for the integration of
migrants in host countries.
During the hour dedicated to free
discussion – between 6 and 7 p.m. – three themes emerged in
particular: with regard to divorced and remarried persons, the need
for a penitential path was highlighted, to be accompanied by
reflection on the case of divorced persons who remain alone and
suffer in silence, at the margins of social life. Secondly, mention
was made of the need to protect the children of divorced couples from
suffering the psychological affects of their parents’ divorce. In
this respect, it was recalled that adequate pastoral care of children
often causes their parents to draw closer to the Church.
Thirdly, the importance of the
relationship between the family and the education of children was
affirmed, with particular reference to parents’ right to choose the
most suitable educational plan for their children, so that they may
receive a quality education.
Finally, the Secretary General of the
Synod, Cardinal Lorenzo Baldisseri, announced that during the eight
general Congregations, there had been a total of 180 interventions
from the Synod Fathers, with the addition of 80 more during the hours
of open debate.
No comments:
Post a Comment